nikolaydubina
commented
2 hours ago cool! let's merge it.
this is definitely go-cover-treemap. treemap package is more fundamental. percentage is very much user/consumer level.
implementation likely in go-cover-treemap.
raise a PR. let's check if this looks good. may be you are right, if lots needs to be changed in the treemap level, then maybe need to update it instead.
check https://github.com/nikolaydubina/go-binsize-treemap. it has something similar, but absolute values.
Hi, the team and I thought it would be great to see the percentage of coverage when visualizing
I have implemented this, but there is a question of how relevant it would be to see? And if it is relevant, in which of the projects should I open a pull request? treemap or in this go-cover-treemap?
I think that according to the logic of the projects, the launch flag and the call should occur in go-cover-treemap, and the implementation in treemap? What do you think? If we come to a common understanding, I will be glad to participate