Open chrstnbwnkl opened 1 year ago
Jep, agree, reachability is better! But definitely a major version sort of thing
ah well, maybe not.. I guess we could support both for a while and add a deprecation label/notice. even though the Isochrone(s)
objects are also "public" API, I wouldn't have a hard time renaming them to Reachabilit-ies/y
..
The
isochrones
method seems to be a bit of a misnomer, because in most cases, the isochrone endpoints can be used for isochrones and isodistances. Something likereachability
could be a better suited name, what do you think? We just released1.0.0
a couple months ago, so maybe something for down the road.