Closed Panquesito7 closed 2 years ago
The README already mentions the license, but you're right, it might be a good idea to add a LICENSE file as well.
Feel free to make a PR to add it, but for now the license is in the readme.
Question: so the design is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0, and the code? 🤔
Actually from the readme I would say that, apart from the design m, everything else (unless explicitly mentioned, but I do not see other mentions) is under Creative Commons (which includes the code).
Not a very good idea to use CC licenses for code, but well. I guess I'll create a PR to add the LICENSE file with that.
Thanks.
Mmh, indeed we usually use MIT for code. We probably could change it?
Description
We should add a license to this repository. This way, people will know what and what not they can do with this repository, permissions, notices, etc.. I suggest adding the MIT license.
Additional Context
https://www.freecodecamp.org/news/how-open-source-licenses-work-and-how-to-add-them-to-your-projects-34310c3cf94/