Closed paciorek closed 4 months ago
@perrydv @danielturek any concerns here? I think testing would reveal any problems, but this does touch any use of a model...
I took a careful look at the changes.
Want to also add igraph::
prefix to line 2385 of BUGS_modelDef.R, for completeness?
graph <<- igraph::make_empty_graph()
Otherwise, I think it's all fine.
This is better practice and should reduce name collisions such as #1469