Open perrydv opened 1 month ago
@perrydv I'm pushing minor cleanup to this, but the logic looks sound.
This is a good patch to have - and I'm also fairly surprised we've never encountered this before.
Also, a push will re-trigger testing, to see if the previous failure with the PG sampler is (perhaps?) intermittant?
Thanks @danielturek . Would you also be up for making the changes in sampler_slice_noncentered
?
I have not investigated the test failures in detail. The one in test-polyagamma looks like it might be a simple monte carlo tolerance issue, where if we inspect and trust the (very slightly different from previous) result we can tweak the tolerance for the test to pass. The test-mcmc failures is a case where gold-file results for a slice sampler example (line 336 of test-mcmc) are no longer matched. That makes sense too. However, superficially the numbers look a bit more meaningfully different, so we'd have to look at whether this is expected to be a well mixed, converged result, etc and decide whether we are confident updating the gold file. Do you want to look at these? Noting for @paciorek too.
@perrydv I've made similar changes to the slice_noncentered
sampler.
Do you have a test case that triggers this error (with contractions to a single integer), which we could add into the MCMC testing?
In any case, the MCMC testing gold file looks like it will need to be updated.
... when at modal value.