effigies
commented
1 year ago Hi @burdinskid13, thanks for your interest. I'll answer both here, but please open a separate bug report for the ICA AROMA one, and I'll copy my response over there.
For the HTML report issue, I wonder if the quicker fix is running --reports-only on the combined derivatives directory after running the two sessions separately. I haven't tried this. You'll also need to use the patch in https://github.com/nipreps/fmriprep/pull/2900 to correctly handle this if you're using --output-layout bids (or not using --output-layout legacy in 21.0+). For this, you can use fmriprep-docker <usual arguments> --patch fmriprep=$PWD/fmriprep if you're running from inside the repository.
If that doesn't work/appeal, adding the session is possible. You would need to modify niworkflows here. We would need to accept a session and optionally add it to the filename. Then in fMRIPrep, we would need to detect that session has a unique value and pass that to niworkflows. Look for the function generate_reports.
For the ICA AROMA regressor naming, to address this, we'll need to look at where they come from. Looks like the ica_aroma_wf has the following output:
That's set here:
So generated by:
So we'll be looking in:
Which calls:
It looks like the metadata and columns are defined in two places:
The fix may be simply to change {} to {:02d}. Would need to test, however, since if it's not an integer type, we'll need to convert name to an integer to do that formatting.
tsalo
What would you like to see added in fMRIPrep?
html report naming: For my use case, I need to run fmriprep on two sessions separately. i'd like to be able to merge the outputs into the same derivatives directory afterwards. however, since the html reports in the new layout (eg. in v22) are above the ses- directory, i would need to rename the html reports in order to not have two files named the same in the same location. it would be great if the html report naming could include ses- in addition to sub-*.
ICA aroma regressor naming: I noticed that the naming of ICA aroma regressors in _desc-confounds_timeseries.json and _desc-confounds_timeseries.tsv is inconsistent. Naming the two regressors the same would make workflows just a little smoother. For example, the first motion regressor in the json is called "aroma_motion_1" but in the tsv it's called " aroma_motion_01". i got this with v22.0.2.
Do you have any interest in helping implement the feature?
Yes, but I would need guidance
Additional information / screenshots
No response