Closed oesteban closed 8 months ago
Yup, happy to review a PR :)
I guess instead of flake8?
Also, while I am not a big fan of .pre-commit, it is recommended by Repo-Review: https://learn.scientific-python.org/development/guides/repo-review/?repo=nipreps%2Fmriqc&branch=master
How about adding support for .pre-commit instead of explicitly running a ruff job?
I would prefer to stay away from pre-commit. It places some burden on the contributor to set it up and I don't love how the project is driven.
The only gain is averting some CI tests to fail. I think we can live with that.
@oesteban Do you intend to add a CI job for ruff, in addition to or instead of the flake8 CI job?