Closed arokem closed 7 months ago
Would DKI be substantially slower?
Regarding reliability, it depends on your definition:
I think we could actually have both. Since DTI is only used with the lower b-values, we are basically not looking into the high values' problems. It could make sense to use DTI for low b-values and also DKI for high b-values.
wdyt?
DKI is not substantially slower than DTI, because it's also solved as a linear set of equations.
I agree that it would be good to know about voxels with aphysical signals (which are a good canary in the coal mine), but I think that DKI would also report about those. The reliability I am referring to is consistency across different sets of b-values. As in this paper (Figure 9).
It would be interesting to produce both and see whether that's not overwhelming. Either way, I think that it would be easy to implement, but would require a slight adaptation of the API, because we'd want self.inputs.free_water_model
to allow selection between the three different models.
Looks like we're allowing DTI and FWDTI here:
https://github.com/nipreps/mriqc/blob/61b59e01777fccd381fee9ac4ffc28a7b65c2f5c/mriqc/interfaces/diffusion.py#L462
DKI can also be used to calculate FA, and that might have advantages in some cases (generally more reliable, doesn't require excluding higher b-values ... to a point).