Closed larsoner closed 4 years ago
Maybe a better example use-case would be doing some kind of discrete labeling in low-res space and then propagating the labels to the high-res surface?
some kind of discrete labeling in low-res space and then propagating the labels to the high-res surface?
That's basically what a MNE inverse solution is, a low(er)-res subsampling of the high res surface and then when we plot we upsample.
Ultimately this might not even need an example, so I can revert it if need be. I'd rather not write a separate new one just for this.
Merging #275 into master will increase coverage by
0.35%
. The diff coverage is100%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #275 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 73.96% 74.31% +0.35%
==========================================
Files 7 7
Lines 2535 2570 +35
Branches 511 514 +3
==========================================
+ Hits 1875 1910 +35
Misses 482 482
Partials 178 178
Got the little indexing demons worked out, this is what the MEG one looks like with 'nearest'
https://281-1551431-gh.circle-artifacts.com/0/html/auto_examples/plot_meg_inverse_solution.html
That's right — just the changes file that is usually the basis for a release announcement email.
That file only goes up to 0.8, and we've released 0.9 already. I guess we're a bit behind there. I can add a 0.9 and dev section here sometime today or tomorrow
Feast your eyes on the beautiful changelog:
https://282-1551431-gh.circle-artifacts.com/0/html/changes.html
I have rarely been so pleased...
Allows doing
smoothing_steps='nearest'
so you can see the patches of cortex like (not the most relevant example but gives the idea):