Closed niryariv closed 10 years ago
tried git gc?
Twitter:@alonisser https://twitter.com/alonisser LinkedIn Profile http://www.linkedin.com/in/alonisser Facebook https://www.facebook.com/alonisser _Tech blog:_4p-tech.co.il/blog _Personal Blog:_degeladom.wordpress.com Tel:972-54-6734469
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 5:33 PM, Nir Yariv notifications@github.com wrote:
the repo is still larger than it should be:
Writing objects: 100% (471/471), 12.37 MiB
Must be some leftover gushim maps
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/niryariv/opentaba-client/issues/73.
ran it locally but the difference seems marginal. i think it's probably data/jerusalem.json and maybe some other leftovers in git history
git gc
only deletes stuff locally and doesn't change the remote size, no?
anyways, i deleted a few more files. i did not want to delete the contributed files (but i did delete their history), and jerusalem.json is still in use with the version that is currently published on gh-pages, so i'll delete it after we finish using it to avoid confusion. i think 14 mb is fine for the repo - including tests with images, the lib folder, the 3 gushim files (one topojson, one dwg and one zip) and over a year and a half of work. i feel that rewriting history like this is not really for the best and we shouldn't go all out with this...
Plus one On Sep 15, 2014 11:40 AM, "florpor" notifications@github.com wrote:
git gc only deletes stuff locally and doesn't change the remote size, no?
anyways, i deleted a few more files. i did not want to delete the contributed files (but i did delete their history), and jerusalem.json is still in use with the version that is currently published on gh-pages, so i'll delete it after we finish using it to avoid confusion. i think 14 mb is fine for the repo - including tests with images, the lib folder, the 3 gushim files (one topojson, one dwg and one zip) and over a year and a half of work. i feel that rewriting history like this is not really for the best and we shouldn't go all out with this...
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/niryariv/opentaba-client/issues/73#issuecomment-55564743 .
i did git gc locally, saw the dir size only changed marginally so assumed it's not the cleanup we're looking for..
localhost:Projects niryariv$ git clone git@github.com:niryariv/opentaba-client.git
Cloning into 'opentaba-client'...
remote: Counting objects: 3137, done.
remote: Compressing objects: 100% (1019/1019), done.
remote: Total 3137 (delta 1602), reused 2858 (delta 1449)
Receiving objects: 100% (3137/3137), 28.53 MiB | 1.24 MiB/s, done.
Resolving deltas: 100% (1602/1602), done.
Checking connectivity... done.
just merged changes into gh-pages branch. add me as collaborator to israel-gushim so i can push the originals. the 28 mb size is because of other branches. after i add originals to your repo i'll do some more deletion work (and you'll need to rebase again).
I don't understand the problem .. 28MB is perfectly acceptable.
Twitter:@alonisser https://twitter.com/alonisser LinkedIn Profile http://www.linkedin.com/in/alonisser Facebook https://www.facebook.com/alonisser _Tech blog:_4p-tech.co.il/blog _Personal Blog:_degeladom.wordpress.com Tel:972-54-6734469
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 2:19 PM, florpor notifications@github.com wrote:
just merged changes into gh-pages branch. add me as collaborator to israel-gushim so i can push the originals. the 28 mb size is because of other branches. after i add originals to your repo i'll do some more deletion work (and you'll need to rebase again).
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/niryariv/opentaba-client/issues/73#issuecomment-55577568 .
since we're now creating new repo for each city, it's faster when the repo size is smaller. also, we moved all the gushim maps to https://github.com/niryariv/israel_gushim so no point in keeping them there.
in any case, it's not really a big deal, just housekeeping.
the repo is still larger than it should be:
Must be some leftover gushim maps