Closed NabeelUppel closed 1 month ago
Sorry for the delay. This makes sense. We currently have vi
for the time being, but I believe nano might be more convenient in some cases if we're expecting people to ssh and edit config.
Only concern how much size impact does it have on the image. Not that we have a super optimised image, but wouldn't want to bloat it. I don't think nano
would be very large though.
I personally only ever SSH'ed into it to edit config files. I can't speak about the size difference but from my understanding nano is very lightweight so you would assume it would be quite small too. I didn't notice any size difference when building the image locally.
Merged. Thanks a lot! :)
Useful for editing config files from terminal