Use Array.prototype.reduce() instead of map()

[Rohitrky2021]

Use Array.prototype.reduce() instead of map() Using Array.prototype.reduce() instead of Array.prototype.map() can reduce the number of iterations over the array and make the code more efficient:

[Rohitrky2021]

Use Array.prototype.reduce() instead of map() make the code more efficient:

[nishantwrp]

Hey @Rohitrky2021, I don't understand how using reduce here is more efficient than using map. You might want to go through this stackoverflow question.

[Rohitrky2021]

if modifying the original array is not a concern and the goal is to return a single value after iterating over the array, then using the reduce method as in the first function might be a more concise approach.the map method is more efficient in terms of performance, but the choice between the two ultimately depends on the specific needs of the implementation.

[nishantwrp]

map is better for this usecase, hence closing this pr.

if modifying the original array is not a concern

We're not changing the original array in any approach.

return a single value after iterating over the array

we want array of objects (one for each element in the original array)

[nishantwrp]

However, if you're interested to contribute more to this project, please let me know. There are a couple of enhancements that I have in mind.