Suggestion: Increase the maximum result limit to 100 or 1000

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Can we please increase the maximum result limit to 100 or 1000, please?

even if you guys demand we put some message that says 'Powered by Google' 
or whatnot ... i'm sure we're all happy to do that. pretty please?!!

Original issue reported on code.google.com by partner5...@vansoftcorp.com on 3 Jun 2008 at 5:22

[GoogleCodeExporter]

The TOU do require that you include Google branding on any page which displays 
search
results obtained through the API.

Original comment by jrgeer...@gmail.com on 3 Jun 2008 at 11:01

• Added labels: Type-Suggestion
• Removed labels: Type-Defect

[GoogleCodeExporter]

At least 100 results would be nice.  Don't let Yahoo out do yah Google.

Original comment by sff...@gmail.com on 3 Jun 2008 at 1:29

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Original comment by internal...@gmail.com on 3 Jun 2008 at 5:52

• Added labels: APIType-Search

[GoogleCodeExporter]

I was wondering are there any search engine APIs that have a lower limit than 
google?

Original comment by AnnanFay@gmail.com on 7 Jun 2008 at 4:19

[GoogleCodeExporter]

this is truley one of the biggest drawbacks to the google search API. i dont
understand their aversion to "opening  the door" since everyone everywhere 
knows the
results come from google ... oh well back to yahoo API

Original comment by mtri...@gmail.com on 15 Jun 2008 at 6:58

[GoogleCodeExporter]

As said above!

Original comment by aj.burto...@gmail.com on 18 Jun 2008 at 11:55

[GoogleCodeExporter]

+1 vote

Original comment by juts...@gmail.com on 5 Aug 2008 at 4:04

[GoogleCodeExporter]

What about a 'developer' access that can be paid for just like when you have to 
up
your request limit. I'm sure people would pay to have accurate results on their 
site
if they think the information is important enough.

Original comment by vizion...@gmail.com on 21 Aug 2008 at 9:57

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Just a heads up to anyone watching this:  you can now obtain up to 64 results 
through
most searchers.

Original comment by jrgeer...@gmail.com on 9 Sep 2008 at 10:48

[GoogleCodeExporter]

really need more results.... +1

Original comment by RichBra...@gmail.com on 5 Oct 2008 at 8:08

[GoogleCodeExporter]

+many. Really do not like the jumping off my site experience.

Original comment by neil.b...@gmail.com on 11 Dec 2008 at 2:14

[GoogleCodeExporter]

is there any paid service in google to get more results ,need help pls

Original comment by ahmadzah...@gmail.com on 15 Apr 2009 at 3:11

[GoogleCodeExporter]

The 64 limit is ridiculous.
I just found out about this limit and will have to abandon my school research
project... (1 week wasted)

I've had it with google! --- i'm writing my own crawler and going to index the 
web
from home.
40 pages down, 5 000 000 000 to go ;)

Original comment by ivan.sa...@gmail.com on 29 Apr 2009 at 6:25

[GoogleCodeExporter]

As far as I'm concerned, having only 64 results is a significant defect.  It 
breaks
the Custom Search to suddenly go to a Google-branded page.  I can't recommend 
this
for anything but simple tests until the limit goes away.

Original comment by searchto...@gmail.com on 23 Jul 2009 at 2:22

[GoogleCodeExporter]

There is no 64 LIMIT it's per type per fileextension per size. 

Just circle through them and you get a total of 64*7sizes*4types*4extensions = 
7168 results.

Original comment by samialb...@gmail.com on 13 Aug 2009 at 3:53

[GoogleCodeExporter]

I added som code here that does it:
http://www.teamlalala.com/blog/2009/01/05/google-api-limits-results-to-64-which-
limits-the-types-of-
businesses-you-can-build/

The code will return any number of images per page that you want. I put it at 
32 since thats best for my page, 
but i testet it with 200 images per page and i works perfectly. Just change the 
max_per_page variable to whatever 
you like (below 7168 :D ) .

Original comment by samialb...@gmail.com on 13 Aug 2009 at 3:59

[GoogleCodeExporter]

I would like this too.

It doesn't even make sense that the king of search engine even has limitations! 
I 
mean, Yahoo and Bing did much better! Why oh why do we have to suffer from 
shitty 
APIs from Google? The upgrade to the AJAX API was a disgrace, since that was 
when the 
limitations came along in the first place.

I'm the creator of Fusionsearch (http://fsearch.us) that has like 100.000 
visitors 
per day, and I am really considering excluding Google, because it pulls 
everything 
else down. It's so sad really!

Switch to Bing or Yahoo! They have no limitations at all.

I saw a blog post by Google where they said "oh look at how nice we are, we 
upgraded 
the amount of maximum results to 32!" WOW! 32?! HOLY ... ! THAT'S A LOT INDEED!

I mean, come on! Your own search engine can pull out like hundreds of results 
on a 
single page, in less than a second! Removing the limitation or limiting it to 
like 
100 results would make a lot of your users actually USE your API.

Original comment by flamefus...@gmail.com on 17 Nov 2009 at 9:21

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Issue 508 has been merged into this issue.

Original comment by jrgeer...@gmail.com on 30 Aug 2010 at 2:55

[GoogleCodeExporter]

The new Custom Search API 
(http://code.google.com/apis/customsearch/v1/overview.html) supports up to 100 
results.  That and the other Search APIs will not be providing a greater depth 
than they currently do.

Please remember that automated queries are prohibited by the Terms of Service 
and all requested results must be shown to the end user, who typically prefers 
to perform a different search if they don't quickly find what they're looking 
for.

Original comment by adam.fel...@gtempaccount.com on 10 Nov 2010 at 10:50

• Changed state: WontFix

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Issue 22 has been merged into this issue.

Original comment by adam.fel...@gtempaccount.com on 10 Nov 2010 at 10:56

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Original comment by adam.fel...@gtempaccount.com on 13 Nov 2010 at 2:20

• Added labels: Restrict-AddIssueComment-Commit

[GoogleCodeExporter]

Issue 213 has been merged into this issue.

Original comment by adam.fel...@gtempaccount.com on 20 Dec 2010 at 7:59