search

niteshkejriwal / morelinq

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/morelinq
0 stars 0 forks source link

Review: MoreEnumerable.Incremental() #46

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
Purpose of code changes on this branch:

Rev 137: Implementation of the Incremental operator which visits each
adjacent pair of elements in a sequence: {N,N+1}, {N+1,N+2}, {N+2,N+3} ...
and applies a projection to them. An overload is available that is also
supplied the zero-based index of the *second* element in the pair. The
number of items in the result sequence will always be one less than in the
source. Incremental returns an empty sequence if passed a sequence of less
than two items. Incremental operates in a deferred, streaming fashion. 

When reviewing my code changes, please focus on:

* The public interface of the extension method.
* The effectiveness and clarity of the available XML comment documentation.
* How well this operator fits into the MoreLINQ ecosystem of
extension methods.
* The extent of coverage available from the corresponding unit tests.
* Whether edge cases are correctly identified and handled in the
implementation and tests.

After the review, I'll merge this branch into:
/trunk

Original issue reported on code.google.com by ambientl...@gmail.com on 23 Jan 2010 at 5:16

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
Now migrated to Hg and available in clone:
http://code.google.com/r/azizatif-morelinq-evenmore/
This clone is ready to be cloned :O) for further review. It also has the 
main/default branch already merged in to bring it up to date.

Original comment by azizatif on 25 May 2012 at 11:38

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago

Original comment by azizatif on 3 Jun 2012 at 9:08

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
Seems redundant with Pairwise.

Original comment by azizatif on 3 Jun 2012 at 9:11

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
Following no response from ambientlion (who possibly/assuming lost interest 
given it has taken years to get this far), taking ownership of issue to 
consider as addition for MoreLINQ 2.0 milestone.

Original comment by azizatif on 12 Jun 2013 at 10:10

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
This issue was closed by revision ecbb044b3f86.

Original comment by azizatif on 14 Jun 2013 at 5:18

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
Duplicate with Pairwise that was already published with release 1.0

Original comment by azizatif on 14 Jun 2013 at 5:55