Assignment Points Grade Evidence Pull Request (Integration) 2 1.8 Original Pull Request & Edited Pull Request Relevancy Checklist (Peer) 2 (80/90)*2 =1.778 Tarun’s Peer Review Lesson (Group) 1 0.93 Team Teach Our score was a 0.93 because we covered the whole of Unit 6 in a very unique way by dividing the team teach into 3 stations. This allowed us to teach our unit with a better student-to-teacher ratio. Because of this, Mr. Mortenson recognized this unique approach and gave us a 0.93. Homework, Popcorn Hacks 1 x 8 (0.9+0.9+0.92+0.9+0.93+0.91+0.91+0.9)=7.27 Foundations This project highlights my understanding and knowledge from the homework and popcorn hacks Individual Contribution 1 0.93 Commits on my part of lesson Per
Sprint 2 Blog | Nitin Balaji
Assignment Points Grade Evidence Pull Request (Integration) 2 1.8 Original Pull Request & Edited Pull Request Relevancy Checklist (Peer) 2 (80/90)*2 =1.778 Tarun’s Peer Review Lesson (Group) 1 0.93 Team Teach Our score was a 0.93 because we covered the whole of Unit 6 in a very unique way by dividing the team teach into 3 stations. This allowed us to teach our unit with a better student-to-teacher ratio. Because of this, Mr. Mortenson recognized this unique approach and gave us a 0.93. Homework, Popcorn Hacks 1 x 8 (0.9+0.9+0.92+0.9+0.93+0.91+0.91+0.9)=7.27 Foundations This project highlights my understanding and knowledge from the homework and popcorn hacks Individual Contribution 1 0.93 Commits on my part of lesson Per
https://nitinsandiego.github.io/NitinBstudent_2025/2024/10/07/Sprint-2-Review-Ticket_IPYNB2.html