Assignment Points Grade Evidence Pull Request (Integration) 2 1.8 Original Pull Request & Edited Pull Request Relevancy Checklist (Peer) 2 (80/90)*2 =1.778 Tarun’s Peer Review Lesson (Group) 1 0.93 Team Teach Our score was a 0.93 because we covered the whole of Unit 6 in a very unique way by dividing the team teach into 3 stations. This allowed us to teach our unit with a better student-to-teacher ratio. Because of this, Mr. Mortenson recognized this unique approach and gave us a 0.93. Homework, Popcorn Hacks 1 x 8 (0.9+0.9+0.92+0.9+0.93+0.91+0.91+0.9)=7.27 Foundations This project highlights my understanding and knowledge from the homework and popcorn hacks Individual Contribution 1 0.93 Commits on my part of lesson Per
Overall, it is solid work and then the blog and the issue are very organized as well. The issue included images and good summaries which will be really helpful when reviewing the units.
Sprint 2 Blog | Nitin Balaji
Assignment Points Grade Evidence Pull Request (Integration) 2 1.8 Original Pull Request & Edited Pull Request Relevancy Checklist (Peer) 2 (80/90)*2 =1.778 Tarun’s Peer Review Lesson (Group) 1 0.93 Team Teach Our score was a 0.93 because we covered the whole of Unit 6 in a very unique way by dividing the team teach into 3 stations. This allowed us to teach our unit with a better student-to-teacher ratio. Because of this, Mr. Mortenson recognized this unique approach and gave us a 0.93. Homework, Popcorn Hacks 1 x 8 (0.9+0.9+0.92+0.9+0.93+0.91+0.91+0.9)=7.27 Foundations This project highlights my understanding and knowledge from the homework and popcorn hacks Individual Contribution 1 0.93 Commits on my part of lesson Per
https://nitinsandiego.github.io/NitinBstudent_2025/2024/10/07/Sprint-2-Review-Ticket_IPYNB2.html