Open nitred opened 2 years ago
WG Server
As above, except the peer was connected over gigabit Ethernet, and the iperf test duration was increased to 15s.
Thanks for you tool. I needed to adapt it in order to bind to a specific interface (vpn tunneling).
Data seems hard to analyze...
Data seems hard to analyze...
That's a lot of columns and rows to work with, you could reduce the the MTU ranges for the peer, seems like anything above 1435 is not gonna work so could have that as the max, or you could modify the figsize
to something bigger like 24, 24
instead of 12, 12
so the labels are more visible:
Something like that ?
Test with peer connected to cellular
Test with peer connected to wifi via ethernet
WG Server
Machine: Racknerd Black Friday
Location: Atlanta
Ubuntu 20.04
Max bandwidth: 1000Mbps
WG Peer
Machine: Vultr $24
Location: Atlanta
Ubuntu 22.04
Max bandwidth: 1000Mbps
Heatmap:
WG Server
WG Peer
This test burns a lot of bandwidth and what I mean by a lot is more than 400gb if you do by step 10.
WG server: Czech Republic, virtual private server, Alpine Linux v3.19 WG client: Czech Republic, apartment with 150 Mbps connection, Alpine Linux v3.19
I am personally very curious how the MTUs behave across different setups. So if possible please share your heatmaps and a generic description (without any sensitive info) of your WG Peer and WG Server setups.
Do not post any info you are not comfortable sharing. Just leave those details blank. Feel free to add additional info if it helps making sense of your heatmap. I'll start off.
SO Post describing how to attach files to Github issues
WG Server
WG Peer
Heatmap