fix: use correct security scheme component name for api rules.

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 1 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 1.33%. Comparing base (4a8c349) to head (042adea).

Files	Patch %	Lines
pkg/collector/spec.go	0.00%	1 Missing :warning:

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #701 +/- ## ===================================== Coverage 1.33% 1.33% ===================================== Files 72 72 Lines 7318 7318 ===================================== Hits 98 98 Misses 7215 7215 Partials 5 5 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/nitrictech/cli/pull/701/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=nitrictech) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/nitrictech/cli/pull/701/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=nitrictech) | `1.33% <0.00%> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=nitrictech#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

nitrictech / cli

fix: use correct security scheme component name for api rules. #701

Codecov Report