codecov[bot]
commented
2 months ago Codecov Report
Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 1186 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
Project coverage is 2.64%. Comparing base (
b605a39) to head (6bb7992). Report is 1 commits behind head on main.
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #779 +/- ## ======================================== - Coverage 2.95% 2.64% -0.32% ======================================== Files 82 85 +3 Lines 9342 10442 +1100 ======================================== Hits 276 276 - Misses 9054 10154 +1100 Partials 12 12 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/nitrictech/cli/pull/779/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=nitrictech) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/nitrictech/cli/pull/779/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=nitrictech) | `2.64% <0.00%> (-0.32%)` | :arrow_down: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=nitrictech#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
nitric-bot
Still need to implement a local run/start implementation. This just includes collection code for deployments. With lots of duplication from services at the moment.