Thanks for creating this tool. I'm running paired tumor-normal WGS samples. Using msisensor2 scan returns ~30 million sites when running with default settings. This seems excessive and msisensor2 msi takes very long to run. Do you recommend more appropriate parameters for msisensor scan when using WGS data?
Thanks for creating this tool. I'm running paired tumor-normal WGS samples. Using
msisensor2 scan
returns ~30 million sites when running with default settings. This seems excessive andmsisensor2 msi
takes very long to run. Do you recommend more appropriate parameters formsisensor scan
when using WGS data?