Open imxade opened 2 years ago
I will look at dinit thanks, I don't have much time currently, but the hope is to develop a first party init system. dinit may be a good stop gap measure. I am definitely against s6, as systemd's issues are not just about the implementation in my opinion.
I will look at dinit thanks, I don't have much time currently, but the hope is to develop a first party init system. dinit may be a good stop gap measure. I am definitely against s6, as systemd's issues are not just about the implementation in my opinion.
What is wrong with s6? I don't know much, it seemed like a decent option to me.
s6 is just copying systemd and systemd's issues are not just with the implementation but with everything.
s6 is just copying systemd and systemd's issues are not just with the implementation but with everything.
If possible, can you please elaborate? Because from where I stay it really seems to be superior to systemd (at least to it) as it's faster, smaller, portable, etc. As far as I know it's also faster than runit or openrc (I may be making a mistake), so I'm really confused right now.
@kuramashinobi13 I personally don't like much more about systemd than just the implementation a lot of the design choices are silly. Requires
vs Wants
, the unstructured settings files which just create a mess. But I do have to admit that since this was opened I've grown less opposed to systemd-isims, so either s6 or dinit are on the table. Switching would resolve a lot of issues what I've had to work around currently...
@imxade after, uh, 2 years or so, #42 exists
Would love to see dinit as an init system.
s6 will also attract many users.