Closed LoganBarnett closed 3 months ago
Hey @LoganBarnett -- I'm happy to try to help. I would guess your kernel derivation is different for some reason. Can you share the output of:nix derivation show .#nixosConfigurations.<your config key>.config.boot.kernelPackages.kernel
?
Thanks for getting back to me so quickly! I'm having trouble reproducing it now. I've made some adjustments to my follows
for my inputs (I have a lot of inputs now), so I'm thinking maybe that's the cause. My build hasn't completed but I believe it's getting well past the patching phase.
Let's close this for now and I can reopen (or ask to reopen) if I run into something I can minimally reproduce. Thanks again!
I'm running into an issue building my own kernel. I'm on 26d6ba2a91e6384252bfea5e94c3364e7f8879f2 (latest
master
at time of writing). The patches don't appear to be applying due to conflicts.I've tried moving back some commits and trying out the cachix substituter. When moving back I get an error with a missing
nixpkgs
(which I can see is later corrected), and the substituter doesn't seem to be picking anything up. I think that might be due to the substituter only containing an older kernel?So I'm thinking some potential avenues to try out:
nixpkgs
issue separately from kernel upgrades, then use the older kernel (I can do this, just haven't gotten to it yet).nix.conf
when I'm back on my home network later this evening so we know I'm actually using the substituter. Near as I can tellnix build
will not just tell me.x86-linux
but I would think this would make no difference when applying patches.Thanks for your work on this! I came across this wanting to build a completely ready Pi image (which was working back on the Pi 3s) and couldn't figure out how to do it via modern
nixpkgs
et. al.