njcuk9999
commented
9 months ago Okay so actually some of these "non weird" ones may be "weird".
I updated the astrometric database today and removed duplicates (I'm tagging @CharlesCadieux as he has some interest in this)
These are a list of files that had duplicates. I did one of three things:
- I merged them
- had to do a fix (empty string in alias ones might have been flagged as another object)
- ignored them
BDP02_1729 <-- Not a duplicate but had a bad alias (empty string)
DX_CNC <-- Duplicate of GJ1111 (kept DX_CNC)
EE_LEO <-- Duplicate of GJ402 (kept EE_LEO)
GJ1111 <-- Duplicate of GJ1111 (kept DX_CNC)
GJ2 <-- Not a duplicate but had a bad alias (empty string)
GJ402 <-- Duplicate of EE_LEO (kept EE_LEO)
GJ411 <-- Duplicate of GL411 (kept GJ411)
GJ4247 <-- Duplicate of V374PEG (kept GJ4227)
GJ555 <-- Duplicate of HN_LIB (kept GJ555)
GJ617B <-- Duplicate of GL617B (kept GJ617B)
GJ628 <-- Duplicate of V2306_OPH (kept GJ628)
GJ752A <-- Duplicate of GL752A (kept GH752A)
GJ87 <-- Duplicate of GL87 (kept GJ87)
GJ876A <-- Duplicate of GL876 (kept GJ876A)
GJ905 <-- Duplicate of GL905 (kept GJ905)
GJ9520 <-- Duplicate of OTSER (kept GJ9520)
GL15A <-- Duplicate of GX_AND (kept GL15A)
GL15B <-- Duplicate of GQ_AND (kept GL15B)
GL176 <-- Duplicate of HD_285968 (kept GL176)
GL411 <-- Duplicate of GJ411 (kept GJ411)
GL617B <-- Duplicate of GL617B (kept GJ617B)
GL752A <-- Duplicate of GL752A (kept GH752A)
GL83_1 <-- Duplicate of TZ_ARI (kept TZ_ARI)
GL87 <-- Duplicate of GJ87 (kept GJ87)
GL876 <-- Duplicate of GJ876A (kept GJ876A)
GL905 <-- Duplicate of GJ905 (kept GJ905)
GQ_AND <-- Duplicate of GL15B (kept GL15B)
GX_AND<-- Duplicate of GX_AND (kept GL15A)
HD18978 <-- Duplicate of TAU3_ERI (kept HD18978)
HD_285968 <-- Duplicate of GL176 (kept GL176)
HN_LIB <-- Duplicate of GJ555 (kept GJ555)
OTSER <-- Duplicate of GJ9520 (kept GJ9520)
SCR_J1546M5534 <-- ignored as duplicate
SCR_J1845M6357 <-- ignored as duplicate
TAU3_ERI <-- Duplicate of HD18978 (kept HD18978)
TOIM837 <-- Not a duplicate but had a bad alias (empty string)
TZ_ARI <-- Duplicate of GL83_1 (kept TZ_ARI)
V2306_OPH <-- Duplicate of GJ628 (kept GJ628)
V374PEG <-- Duplicate of GJ4227 (kept GJ4227)Could I be a pain and get you (@alexandrineLH) to check which ones of these are in your errors.
Also BETAPICMB is in the reject list (it is a planet and we don't actually want to do LBL on a planet) so could you (@alexandrineLH ) also check any others (that aren't in the list above) against the reject list (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1dOogfEwC7wAagjVFdouB1Y1JdF9Eva4uDW6CTZ8x2FM/edit?usp=sharing)
If @CharlesCadieux could just go over the merges I did (first list) I'd appreciate a second pair of eyes that these are correct.
If you want to run the code I used its in apero-utils/general/apero_astrometrics/merge_duplicate_rows.py I can send you the bad_object yaml. If you dont' want to run the code here is my log as well so you can see the comparison for each object.
alexandrineLH
Since 2024-02-28, I'm getting many APERO error messages linked to the apero_lbl_compile_nirps_ha recipe (shortname = LBLCOMPILE_SCI). Here is an example for every type of error message:
class apero.core.core.drs_exceptions.LogExit : No Teff found: -- For objects with "real" names: BETAPICMB
-- For objects with weird names: NIGHT_SKYMSKY_M_HA
LBL Compile Exception [BDP07_2692_BDP07_2692] class lbl.core.base_classes.LblException : No lblrv files found No weird object names here
LBL Compile Exception [GJ1164A_GJ1164A] class lbl.core.base_classes.LblException : Unexpected lbl_compile.py error: class ValueError : zero-size array to reduction operation minimum which has no identity LBL Compile Exception No weird object name here