Closed astronasko closed 5 months ago
You are correct that this was an artifact of an "older function"; apologies for not having been more thorough. I checked that this has been accounted for in other instrument files (carmenes.py, espresso.py, nirps.py etc.), which validates your argument. I think this is enough for this PR.
Hello,
I deal with cases where blaze files are not readily available for every observation, and only one common daily blaze file is provided. Some times they don't have headers, which leads to an error of this kind:
Because LBL unpacks the data-header tuple and discards the header anyway, I thought it might be useful to catch this error.