Open andrescarmona opened 3 years ago
You are correct it isn't in there - it probably should be.
Maybe @eartigau can correct me but I think the only changes are:
o_pp_e2dsff_C.fits
files into the science directory (in an FP
) directory for odometers that have a FP in their C fibera_pp_e2dsff_C.fits
files (FP_FP
) into the science directory (in an FP
)FP_pos.fits
file into the masks
directoryTemplate_s1d_FP_sc1d_v_file_AB.fits
into the templates directoryconfig.yaml
OBJECT_SCIENCE: FP
OBJECT_TEMPLATE: FP
INPUT_FILE: *e2dsff*C.fits
The FP_pos.fits
file and Template_s1d_FP_sc1d_v_file_AB.fits
file don't come from APERO so @eartigau will have to tell you how to make these or give you them I guess?
@eartigau can you also check my config.yaml
parameters above
Thanks Neil, we have the blaze AB, should we use the blaze_C ?
I have from the previous release the FP_pos.fits file and Template_s1d_FP_sc1d_v_file_AB.fits. I was wondering whether we have a Template_s1d_FP_sc1d_v_file_C.fits ?
So I think this was just Etienne being lazy - Template_s1d_FP_sc1d_v_file_AB.fits
is actually Template_s1d_FP_sc1d_v_file_C.fits
i.e. it is made of s1d FP from the C fibers (as far as I am aware) and not from the AB s1d (as there are far far fewer of these).
The reason it has this name is probably just that the "default" mask is defined as: "Templates1d{OBJECT_TEMPLATE}_v_file_AB.fits` and from your config you set:
# Set template object name
OBJECT_TEMPLATE: FP
therefore it "needs" the _AB.fits
part - you could rename this FP template file and in the config file set:
# Set template file (None for default)
TEMPLATE_FILE: Template_s1d_FP_sc1d_v_file_C.fits
and the result would be the same.
@eartigau correct me if I am wrong about the s1d template coming from the C files not the AB.
Hello, I miss in the README the instructions for generating the drift file
cheers,
Andres