Closed whaeck closed 4 years ago
This problem was due to an array index overflow in acecpe. It was fixed in #172
Still time to make the above evaluation more in line with a more realistic knowledge of cross-section and not a numerical exercise :
42 6 226 5 225 3600 3
1.000000+2 1.1551-117 2.000000+2 3.03977-82 3.000000+2 1.35488-66 225 3600 4 4.000000+2 2.75847-57 5.000000+2 6.04874-51 6.000000+2 2.84953-46 225 3600 5 7.000000+2 1.20594-42 8.000000+2 1.00138-39 9.000000+2 2.60358-37 225 3600 6 1.000000+3 2.85824-35 2.000000+3 2.83175-24 3.000000+3 1.91099-19 225 3600 7
Really?
I agree, and I told the evaluators that they can probably change the lower energy limit. It's work in progress but it did point out a potential problem in NJOY so I'll keep it as a test ;-)
For a new d+He3 evaluation, the ACE file produced by NJOY2016 still has a few NaN values appearing in it.
The following input and ENDF file reproduce the issue: input.txt d-002_He_003.endf.txt