Closed jchsublet closed 3 years ago
From ENDF/B-VIII.0 O016 acer check output, but also 40 others targets in ENDF/B-VIII.0 and many TENDL-2019
reaction descriptors -------------------- reaction mt tyr lsig land ldlw emin emax q -------- -- --- ---- ---- ---- ------------ ------------ ------------
(n,2np) 41 -2 2079 -1 50814 2.440886E+01 1.500000E+02 -2.296090E+01 (n,2np) 44 -1 2218 -1 53140 2.374349E+01 1.500000E+02 -2.233500E+01
In acecm.f90 line 32
'(n,2np) ','(n,3np) ','(n,x) ','(n,2np) ','(n,npa) ',& '(n,2np) ','(n,3np) ','(n,x) ','(n,n2p) ','(n,npa) ',& ==> better 41 42 43 44 45
'(n,2np) ','(n,3np) ','(n,x) ','(n,2np) ','(n,npa) ',& '(n,2np) ','(n,3np) ','(n,x) ','(n,n2p) ','(n,npa) ',& ==> better
41 42 43 44 45
In the runes bible:
mt = 41 (z,2np) mt = 44 (z,n2p)
But then mth.eq.44 logic in acefc.f90 seems OK, n=1 and not 2 as for mth.eq.41
Plotr, covr, matxsr, groupr allocation logic for that matter seems right
Fixed in #200
From ENDF/B-VIII.0 O016 acer check output, but also 40 others targets in ENDF/B-VIII.0 and many TENDL-2019
In acecm.f90 line 32
In the runes bible:
mt = 41 (z,2np) mt = 44 (z,n2p)
But then mth.eq.44 logic in acefc.f90 seems OK, n=1 and not 2 as for mth.eq.41
Plotr, covr, matxsr, groupr allocation logic for that matter seems right