Closed whaeck closed 3 years ago
Looks good to me. It appears that we're effectively replacing the current MT=102 ACELAW=33 behavior with proper 2-body kinematics. Since the equations we're using are (I think) only really valid when the mass of both products is non-zero there may be an even better approach if we give it enough thought, but this is certainly better than the current behavior.
@enorrislanl Thanks for looking into this, I'm going to quickly check the photonuclear data to see if ACELAW=33 is used there as well before I merge this in.
@enorrislanl We're good to go on this one. Had some further issues with tests but now we're good.
This fixes issue #212
Some more ACELAW=33 shenanigans: