This PR renames tar_geotiff() to tar_terra_rast(). It separates out the format into a new function, format_terra_rast() that returns the output of a tar_format() call. I separated it out so it could accept a filetype argument where users can choose a GDAL driver (from a list of possibilities we have implemented and tested with targets).
I'm thinking maybe we'll end up having tar functions like `tar_<data type/class>()` with some default storage formats rather than naming the functions after the file type. What do you think?
This PR renames
tar_geotiff()
totar_terra_rast()
. It separates out the format into a new function,format_terra_rast()
that returns the output of atar_format()
call.I separated it out so it could accept afiletype
argument where users can choose a GDAL driver (from a list of possibilities we have implemented and tested withtargets
).I'm thinking maybe we'll end up having tar functions like `tar_<data type/class>()` with some default storage formats rather than naming the functions after the file type. What do you think?
Somewhat addresses #4