Closed lamescholar closed 4 months ago
Most likely never going to happen (#57) but I wish there was a way to achieve this too.
@lamescholar what's the scale of your feed? I've initially tested it against a subscription with 1000 feeds, which it handled fine, though I didn't run long-term test and how it'd affect it performance-wise.
Currently it does delete old feeds to cleanup space and prevent performance decrease (see here).
I have about 600 feeds. After a month, when the storage database grows past 1 GB, the program starts to work slower.
I have a feeling that SQLite is perfectly capable of handling dbs larger than 1GB. This may be the app issue that needs fine-tuning.
I can do some profiling to find out the root cause, but I need sample db (causing slowness) for that. If you'd be comfortable sharing your local db, drop me a messages at nkanaev [at] live [dot] dom.
I deleted .db recently. At the moment it's 300 MB. I will send it when lags will pop up.
Most likely never going to happen (#57) but I wish there was a way to achieve this too.
I wish for the same thing.
This is one of the greatest tasks in managing database for feed reader. Everything must be stored in order to compare it with currently pulled items.
Did you think of removing all data and keep only identifying information like ID, Link and Dates until they are no longer valid?
*
Items older than X days.
**
By Date I refer to the property "Updated" which is subjected to updates, unlike property "Published" which should be fixed.
***
Until an item is no longer exist on the server.
Hi. Is there any update for this? I'm cleaning up my VPS and found that storage.db
's size reached 600MB. I want to preserve the starred articles while cleaning up the rest, and did that by clearing data of items
, but I'm unsure how to touch search_...
. What do you think? Thanks!
Only for educational purposes. Can I change the date of the general configuration if I apply this comand?
sqlite3 /path/to/your/local.db "update items set status = 1 where date < date('now', '-90 days')"
And the same way, Is possible change the number of news to keep? (Default 50)
Leaving notes for visibility:
@lamescholar has generously provided me a 1.8GB database file with >600 feeds. His complaint was that refreshing feeds and adding a feed were slow. Additionally to that, I've discovered that loading feed articles with pagination was slow in certain cases.
Refreshing feed on my laptop took ~20 mins (with the UI in the browser open) and ~10 mins (with the browser closed). I've managed to bring the refresh time down to ~1 min simply by removing db max connection limitation and switching to WAL journaling mode.
I'll be investigating further to see if any other improvements could be made.
Thank you. As was pointed out by thanhnguyen2187 there is also a problem with db size.
the storage database grows fast in size and the program starts to work slower
this isn't the case anymore.
When you have a lot of feeds, the storage database grows fast in size and the program starts to work slower, so you need to delete the storage database, and start with a clean slate.
The solution may be adding an option to choose the amount of feed articles stored in memory. 100 or 200. So old ones are automatically deleted after refreshing.