to re-trained the model myself. By evaluating the last checkpoint (iteration=500k), I got the performance:
However, the PA-MPJPE reported in the Table 1 of the paper is 41.2, which is lower than 42.8 as I got. Moreover, the evaluation from the given data/checkpoint.pt is
which is actually better than the reported number and thus shows a larger gap with my re-trained weights.
Have I missed any details here to reproduce the performance reported in the paper?
Hi, thanks for the good job.
I tried to run:
to re-trained the model myself. By evaluating the last checkpoint (iteration=500k), I got the performance:
However, the PA-MPJPE reported in the Table 1 of the paper is 41.2, which is lower than 42.8 as I got. Moreover, the evaluation from the given data/checkpoint.pt is
which is actually better than the reported number and thus shows a larger gap with my re-trained weights.
Have I missed any details here to reproduce the performance reported in the paper?