Some inaccuracies in the attributes of classes are noted. For instance {attribute name}: {type} course convention is not followed in function signatures.
In addition the parser class diagram is not reader friendly, with small font sizes and a cluttered formatting.
Reason for disagreement: Still maintain that it qualifies as a layout/font issue, in which case it is VeryLow.
## :question: Issue severity
Team chose [`severity.VeryLow`]
Originally [`severity.Low`]
- [ ] I disagree
**Reason for disagreement:** [replace this with your explanation]
Some inaccuracies in the attributes of classes are noted. For instance {attribute name}: {type} course convention is not followed in function signatures.
In addition the parser class diagram is not reader friendly, with small font sizes and a cluttered formatting.