search

nlbdev / nordic-accessible-epub-guidelines

2 stars 2 forks source link

Consistently use "rearcover" for rearcover class #30

Closed AndersEkl closed 7 months ago

AndersEkl commented 1 year ago

Originally written by @martinpub

Correct 3.1.

martinpub commented 11 months ago

Hi @AndersEkl, @jonaslil and @oscarlcarlsson,

Was going to fix this but I just thought, should we rather use "back cover" consistently? Isn't "back cover" the more frequently used term? We also use "back matter", so this would be in line with that.

However, it involves changing the class name as well, which may not be ideal. What do you think?

martinpub commented 11 months ago

Note, the controlled term to use in English for @aria-label is currently defined as "Back cover", wasn't sure if the original thought was to preserve that and only correct the reference in the table so that it aligns with rearcover.

martinpub commented 8 months ago

I think I still need feedback from you guys, how important is keeping the class name?

AndersEkl commented 8 months ago

I don't have any strong opinions in this matter. I think the rear/back cover is more important for the type of books the libraries produce.

jonaslil commented 8 months ago

I prefer back cover as a term, I think it is more widely used. Googling confirms this.

I would be in favour of changing the classname to "backcover" in 3.3.1.

oscarlcarlsson commented 8 months ago

Me too.

martinpub commented 7 months ago

Great, closing this as completed.