Closed lefuturiste closed 8 months ago
@nlopes You may take a look at this
Thanks for sending over. I'll try to take a look sometime this week.
Thanks for sending over. I'll try to take a look sometime this week.
Hello, I'm kindly asking if you have some update on this, thanks! 😄
Apologies for taking so long. Can you modify your example please? As it stands I don't think it actually exemplifies your change. Or am I misunderstanding it?
Apologies for taking so long. Can you modify your example please? As it stands I don't think it actually exemplifies your change. Or am I misunderstanding it?
Yes you are correct, I will update the example.
In theory I should have rebased this fork, and now I added an example. I also need to fix the code so that 404 are not counting as new labels values.
TODO:
@nlopes can you take a look at this? It should be better now
Hello @nlopes sorry to ask you again, what can be done to get this forward? I know that maintaining opensource software is a burden 😢 .
Almost there. Apologies, I've forgotten about this.
Thanks for your review, I've fix something
the idea for this MR was originally discussed in #72
A change that allow developer to change the cardinality of a given param name for a specific route.
To define a config that goes down the line, we need to use actix
extensions_mut()
method. The external/user developer need to define a middleware that will pass some data down the middleware stack.Example when defining a route:
Feel free to comment or help.