Open thomasyu888 opened 3 years ago
@tschaffter Review this ticket
@thomasyu888 Can you review this ticket before our meeting on Monday? Then let's review it together.
@thomasyu888 Is this ticket required for the launch?
@tschaffter this is not required for launch.
Is your proposal related to a problem?
There are multiple things that currently happen:
annotationSource
when annotating notes. code. This is done in convenience sincefhir_store_id
is already a parameter oflist_notes
Describe the solution you'd like
fhir_store_id
so thatnote_name
can be generated.. It would also take as input TextAnnotationResponse objects. This creates slight confusion when sayingstore_annotations
, because this could mean two things.list_notes
so that notes conform to the Note schemaThoughts @tschaffter, @cascadianblue ?