Right now reference database is required as part of a Consensus Sequence. Each database has a unique ID reference defined with it. Those references are only valid within the scope of the Consensus Sequence per MIRING. However, this means that multiple samples (or multiple consensus sequences within a single sample) must redefine the same reference database with a document-unique key even if they reuse the same database reference.
The question is are we okay with this, or should database/reference be moved to a higher or document global scope.
Right now reference database is required as part of a Consensus Sequence. Each database has a unique ID reference defined with it. Those references are only valid within the scope of the Consensus Sequence per MIRING. However, this means that multiple samples (or multiple consensus sequences within a single sample) must redefine the same reference database with a document-unique key even if they reuse the same database reference.
The question is are we okay with this, or should database/reference be moved to a higher or document global scope.