Open lgragert opened 5 months ago
Also noting that users that attempt an antigen-level redux for C*12
through C*18
alleles will return a null result from py-ARD. For example, for the allele specificity C*12:03
, py-ARD does not have a more ambiguous redux category.
If we decide to support first-field DNA nomenclature rollup, should we provide an option to have the antigen redux for HLA-C also perform a first-field rollup for C*12
through C*18
alleles?
What would be the preferred output for py-ard -r onefield -g "DPB1*104:01:1"
should we also have py-ard -r twofield -g "DPB1*104:01:1"
Probably the closest analogous thing for HLA-DPB1 alleles would be some rollup based on alleles sharing a DPB1 hypervariable region (HVR) amino acid motif or set of HVR motifs? https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32684412/
py-ARD doesn't seem to have a redux mode for first-field DNA nomenclature yet.
The current US organ allocation system supports all three of these HLA specificities:
DRB3*02:02
,DRB3*02
, andDR52
, but py-ARD doesn't have a way to map between all of these categories yet. DRB3/4/5 alleles likeDRB3*02:02
would have a rollup ofDRB3*02
that is more specific than the serologic antigen rollup ofDR52
.DQA1 and DPA1 loci don't have WHO-recognized serologic specificities, so this would be the only way to do a more ambiguous rollup for alleles such as
DPA1*02:07
.Some GL strings with full-field HLA alleles will encompass several first-field specificities, which all should be provided in the output.