Open kellijohnson-NOAA opened 2 years ago
I totally agree. It feels like "SSB" and "spawning stock biomass" is a legacy term that is no longer used when describing results. I would be okay attempting to move away from this but we may want to ask around a bit to understand why spawning stock biomass was initial used.
Sounds good. I will ask Hastie, Jon Brodziak, and Chris Legault. Let me know if you think of others. The Australian glossary just lists "spawning biomass" so I am assuming this will be fine.
@Bai-Li-NOAA can you quantify the use of spawning biomass (SB) versus spawning stock biomass (SSB) in the stock assessments?
@kellijohnson-NOAA. Yes. Will do that today and share the outputs with you!
Here is the summary statistics from 10 assessment reports: <html xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:x="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:excel" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
ID | File_Name | spawning stock biomass\|ssb\|spawning stock output | spawning biomass\|sb -- | -- | -- | -- 1 | BSAIatka.pdf | 6 | 66 2 | c-6-attachment-1-full-assessment-electronic-only-status-of-lingcod-ophiodon-elongatus-along-the-northern-u-s-west-coast-in-2021.pdf | 25 | 50 3 | g-5-attachment-3-draft-full-assessment-of-status-of-the-pacific-spiny-dogfish-shark-resource-off-the-continental-u-s-pacific-coast-in-2021-electronic-only.pdf | 8 | 9 4 | kuriyama_et_al_2020_sardine_assessment.pdf | 52 | 43 5 | noaa_17252_DS1.pdf | 0 | 0 6 | noaa_21164_DS1.pdf | 0 | 3 7 | noaa_24818_DS1.pdf | 10 | 1 8 | S52_Final_SAR_v2.pdf | 119 | 79 9 | S57_Final_SAR.pdf | 19 | 24 10 | SEDAR65_FullSAR_12.8.2020_V3.pdf | 2 | 13 | Total | 241 | 288
It seems weird to me that we use spawning stock biomass but do not add the "stock" modifier to any other term, e.g., we use age 3+ biomass not age 3+ stock biomass. Should we advocate for spawning biomass instead of spawning stock biomass?