feat(style-description): use_tidy_description()

[kellijohnson-NOAA]

Create a workflow for usethis::use_tidy_description().

• Changes to the DESCRIPTION file trigger the workflow
• Does not install the actual package, it just installs {usethis} to run a single function on the DESCRIPTION file
• It is not a check, like R CMD check, so it is only ran on the latest ubuntu
• I tested the workflow in a different repository and tweaked it until it worked, I had trouble installing {usethis} because it requires {curl} which requires some weird installation but I got it figured out

To do items

Items in this list need to be done before I feel comfortable changing from "draft" to actual PR.

• [x] Stop the workflow from running if the previous commit was the workflow
• [x] Ask @k-doering-NOAA if I included all necessary items
• [x] Determine if the workflow should in fact be part of style-r-code, I know we talked about this but it just did not seem right given the DESCRIPTION file is NOT R code

[k-doering-NOAA]

@kellijohnson-NOAA, this looks great! The only thing missing is including the new function use_style_description on the readme. Also, you can remove the .github/workflows/call- file.

I don't think you need to guard against the infinite workflow loop - GitHub will not trigger new workflow runs that were created by previous workflow runs.

what do you think about adding styling the DESCRIPTION file to the doc-and-style-r workflow? I think it does fit will in the scope of this one.

[k-doering-NOAA]

@kellijohnson-NOAA, I'm happy to help wrap this up, if you would like! I can do it myself, or we could work together on it, up to you!

[kellijohnson-NOAA]

@k-doering-NOAA thanks for offering to finish this PR for me. That would be really great if you have time. Sorry that I let it linger for so long.

[k-doering-NOAA]

No worries @kellijohnson-NOAA ! Next time I work on ghactions4r, I'll finish this up :)

[k-doering-NOAA]

@kellijohnson-NOAA I think this is ready to merge - I added usethis::use_tidy_description() to the doc-and-style workflow and tested that it worked.

Do you think you could review, when you have the chance? Not a rush.