Open k-doering-NOAA opened 3 years ago
@Rick-Methot-NOAA is this a new feature to be implemented or a note to check/revise existing code?
This is a long range issue. It should be linked up with the issue for using equilibrium growth for equilibrium conditions.
related to #58
I wasn't sure what was meant by "long range issue" ... do you mean it is vague or it is something we wouldn't work on for a long time (presumably because it is not high priority)
How to do updating of time-varying factors for use in benchmarks and projections is a specific topic on the working group on technical guidance for NS1. Following completion of that guidance we can re-open this issue for implementation. So, putting it ON HOLD.
Imported from redmine, Issue #56287 Opened by @RickMethot on 2018-10-15 Status when imported: On Hold
The following code seems incomplete in its logic. Currently, if R0 is time-varying, SS will recalculate SSB_use and in doing so will use the current year's biology-at-age. However, if R0 is not time-varying, but growth or M is time-varying, then SSB_use will remain same as SSB_virgin. It seems useful to consider whether SSB_use should be updated when there is dynamic growth to be more like a complete dynamic B0. Your thoughts appreciated.