Closed Rick-Methot-NOAA closed 1 year ago
Adding this onto a forecast-related issue because it's so small.
Can the name of this be changed to look more like what you suggested this portion be renamed in the user manual? In the user manual it has been changed to "Base recruitment in forecast" so maybe this can be "#_Forecast base recruitment"
Good idea. Is there other language to add to address Brian's suggestion regarding prioritization of alternative approaches?
I'm not sure if there is here unless a warning needs to be issued, the documentation may be the best place to make that suggestion. I don't know the answer to Brian's question in his most recent email though, so if you could provide some guidance there, I can put it in the documentation.
Fcast_Rec_yr1 and _yr2 are already adjusted to be between styr and endyr (readdata lines 4084 to 4100). This happens to all the forecast years. I know I'm missing something here.
Now in issue #493
Refactor request
Some of the recent changes to control of recdev_end relative to endyr did not take all considerations into account. Note that in readdata, use of retro_yr does not change endyr. All that happens is that data existing after retro_yr are flagged with -f so are ignored in the logL. So, obs in the retro_era anre just like obs in the forecast.
The issues that need attention are:
Expected behavior
better internal logic for when warnings occur and adjustments are made