Closed BenGardiner closed 2 years ago
There is no clear parent of AGW-S-008 "Security Assurance" because all of the security and functional requirements are 'backed' by this. We can't model multiple parents -- which is good b/c we shouldn't either.
The best action is to make AGW-S-008 "Security Assurance" it's own requirement of the AGW set without parent.
AGW-S-008 is a child of NGW-F-001 -- so is NGW-S-001 which makes sense. But where should the Abstract GW AGW-S-008 security assurance requirement be rooted? Perhaps AGW-S-005 Prevents Elevation ?