Closed KillyMXI closed 6 years ago
I find 0.1 to be quite limiting. Usually, numbers are written with the precision that makes sense for them and can be taken into account.
1 -> 2 (lowest) 0.001 -> 0.002 (lowest) 0.16 -> 0.17 (lowest) 0.16 -> 0.26 (second lowest) 0.16 -> 1.16 (third lowest) 1 -> 101 (third lowest)
1 -> 2
0.001 -> 0.002
0.16 -> 0.17
0.16 -> 0.26
0.16 -> 1.16
1 -> 101
Number of positions after decimal point should be kept, obviously. 0.19 -> 0.20 -> 0.21 (lowest)
0.19 -> 0.20 -> 0.21
This is a very good idea! I haven't had much time lately to work on this but it is definitely something I can look into adding. Thanks!
I find 0.1 to be quite limiting. Usually, numbers are written with the precision that makes sense for them and can be taken into account.
1 -> 2
(lowest)0.001 -> 0.002
(lowest)0.16 -> 0.17
(lowest)0.16 -> 0.26
(second lowest)0.16 -> 1.16
(third lowest)1 -> 101
(third lowest)Number of positions after decimal point should be kept, obviously.
0.19 -> 0.20 -> 0.21
(lowest)