search

nmtarr / SEWoodyWetlandAnalysis

Code for an analysis of GAP species, land cover, and protected area data that assesses the importance of woody wetlands in the Southeast for wildlife species and identifies wetland-dependent species and locations where they are most species rich.
Other
1 stars 0 forks source link

Clarity #2

Open nmtarr opened 7 years ago

nmtarr commented 7 years ago

Are the objectives, methods, results, and conclusions clear enough?

albenson-usgs commented 5 years ago

I think Table 2 would be clearer and it would make it easier to see the differences if the table was ordered by Summer % high -> low instead of alphabetically. Would it also make more sense to combine Summer and Winter? Are we learning something important by having these separate?

albenson-usgs commented 5 years ago

There needs to be a better explanation of how one and two are different in the "Protection of SEWW ecological systems and species" section. Why aren't these the same? Or are they?

albenson-usgs commented 5 years ago

I think Table 4 should be ordered by Protected % low -> high so a manager could easily see the priority species and if Table 2 is reordered as I suggested above then a user would already have a place to see the kind of information that's displayed in Table 4.

TWellman commented 5 years ago

In terms of code, it might be valuable to add "one liners" in the README file on the functions of each python script. Currently, there are many scripts . It would be easier to understand the overall code process if the number of scripts were reduced, perhaps simplified by a few key processes.