Closed avaxman closed 5 months ago
Thank you very much for filing this! You were exactly right, there was a coordinate-ordering bug that I had totally missed.
Fixed in 5d0bb5ea8cdaac07264cf2c3dd17c7b7b7f1cb78. Will push a new version of the python lib to incorprate this and other fixes soon.
I run the following pretty classic RBF reconstruction in Python. The Volume grid function seems correct, but the result isosurface is correct up to rotation. I tried both explicit grid and callback, and they both give the same rotation. Since the scalar function is fine, I think something is wrong with the marching cubes.
(change the data folder to accommodate where you put the input). RBF.zip