Closed ebaynaud closed 8 years ago
Is there a reason not to just have an empty back face?
If https://github.com/nnattawat/flip/issues/56 is done, that could be sufficient to suite my needs. Let me try tonight and close this one if ok.
I mean, when it will be done. But I can test it even if it's not there yet and maybe this request has no sense because using an empty element is ok. That is what I want to test.
I mean, when it will be done.
Does this mean you are working on a PR? That would be good :)
Actually the workaround to repeat the front element as a back element after is perfectly ok for the moment. :)
:+1:
I wish flip to work without the back face so only with a front face. Linked to my other enhancement request (360deg instead of 180deg), that would replace totally other libraries I use like rotate3di or jquery transit to get this done.