search

noaa-oar-arl / UFS-Aerosol-Config

NOAA OAR repository of UFS-Aerosol configuration files and cases
MIT License
2 stars 3 forks source link

case/plume-rise-implementation #23

Closed bbakernoaa closed 3 years ago

bbakernoaa commented 3 years ago

Case Details:

We are repeating the Atom1 case study here to test an initial implementation of a plume rise model in UFS-Aerosols. Two model runs were completed using the feature/p7.1-gocart-dev and feature/p7.1-gocart-dev-plumerise branches of UFS-Aerosols. The plume rise algorithm that was first implemented was the simplified sofiev scheme. This was done because the code is straightforward and easy to implement. The case should be the same as in #3

Model Configuration Details

Aerosol Model Configuration

Measurements/Models available for comparison

@siyuan and @perthsb the model results are here:

no plumerise: /scratch1/NCEPDEV/rstprod/tmp/COM/noplume/gfs.201607*/00/chem/ plumerise: /scratch1/NCEPDEV/rstprod/tmp/COM/noplume/gfs.2016072*/00/chem/

preliminary comparison: google slides

@zhanglikate @lipan-NOAA @gjfrost

P.S. the no plumerise run is still completing. Should be done this evening to tomorrow morning.

zhanglikate commented 3 years ago

@bbakernoaa The plume-rise module can only use GBBEPx emission, or QFED is also good to be use? Is it used FRP or not? Thanks.

bbakernoaa commented 3 years ago

@zhanglikate Sofiev is a FRP based scheme. So we could use it for any biomass burning dataset with FRP. I don't currently have the QFED FRP downloaded. Could you help with that? Once there we could easily add it to the RC files.

zhanglikate commented 3 years ago

@bbakernoaa I have no idea about the QFED FRP, either. We discussed that before for Shan's project and can not find the FRP in the QFED data. That is why we finally used GFAS in Shan's S2S, which included FRP. Anyway I can take a look at the code of "simplified sofiev scheme" ? Thanks.

bbakernoaa commented 3 years ago

@zhanglikate You can see the code here

I think that the QFED data uses the MODIS fire product for FRP. So I think that we would need to go back and get that. It isn't included in the QFED files themselves.

bbakernoaa commented 3 years ago

@drpeppurr could you please perform the Atom1 evaluation with these?