Closed blychs closed 1 month ago
No, it doesn't. alg_agl_m_mid is the exact same thing here as in _wrfchem_mm. layer_height_agl was the layer height at the interface, which I was using later to create the thickness to calculate partial columns. SInce the wrfchem reader went a different way, by calculating layer thickness in the reader, I am changing it to do the same, so that future code will work for both. The TEMPO tool can already deal with the way that wrfchem does it.
That way, the TROPOMI tool (or any other) should work for both regardless, since the version loaded by MONETIO will look the same.
The NCDC website still having an issue, causing the test failures.
This makes the camx_mm reader consistent with wrfchem_mm by incorporating "dz_m" instad of "layer_height_agl" We had talked at the time of adapting it once the new wrfchem_mm reader was accepted.
Cheers Pablo