Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
The PSDR ui is less than optimal for non-Flex hardware.
PSDR/IF needs a ui more attuned to the transceivers it attempts to support;
even then the idiosyncrasies of the K3, for example, must be reconciled with
those of Kenwood et al.
I have been removing unused, unwanted code to optimise my PSDR/IF + K3
experience and looking through my source I have an early version without the
Flex hardware options, not even SDR1000 - it uses only 'this.hw is RigHW'.
Might that be a head start?
Original comment by f5...@orange.fr
on 17 Jun 2010 at 11:04
I agree that the UI isn't optimal for non-Flex hardware. And as a developer, we
certainly have the benefit of understanding how things work "under the covers",
so we (developers) aren't likely to have a misunderstanding of what a
particular button/control might do.
That being said, I realize that for some people, they would be overwhelmed by
the UI. But, its not currently a goal to refactor the entire UI to make sense
for every radio it connects to. Not because its not possible, or not useful,
but we have many other areas we could attend to first, including features that
we would find more useful.
The point of this particular defect was to disable hardware selections and
check the RX only box in the setup menu, because this always causes problems
that cause PowerSDR/IF Stage to flat out not work. Some of the other controls
that aren't useful (like BCI Rejection) at least do no harm when they are
toggled.
I am sure many people would find it easier if we stripped away stuff, but hey,
I would rather people play around, experiment, kick the tires and get to
understand why things work the way they do. Even though some people didn't
develop PowerSDR/IF Stage, I think one can learn alot from it thinking about
why something works or doesn't.
Original comment by mccleme...@gmail.com
on 17 Jun 2010 at 12:57
Scott, not to mention the extreme pain it would be to merge latest PowerSDR
code to PowerSDR/IF Stage if all that code was stripped and modified heavily.
Original comment by cgates...@gmail.com
on 17 Jun 2010 at 1:30
I think what Chad did with the collapsed view is really good and hides all
(most?) of the unused controls as well. I know I only use collapsed view these
days.
I would love to redesign out the whole console, like the IC-7800, where the
S-Meter (which also needs work to look good) is directly under/inline with the
VFO frequency.
Original comment by mccleme...@gmail.com
on 17 Jun 2010 at 2:55
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
mccleme...@gmail.com
on 25 May 2010 at 2:51