Open monorimet opened 12 months ago
can we have sdxl turbo too added?
can we have sdxl turbo too added?
Done. https://github.com/nod-ai/SHARK/releases/tag/20231205.1064
i get this on rx 7900xtx on default settings on sd xl turbo
@monorimet
@monorimet Now I've got my LoRA changes vaguely into shape, I'll take a look the nod-ai logo and the gradio update regressions.
EDIT: /em looks at time, sometime tomorrow if no-one has picked them up.
@monorimet it works nevermind
When switching to sdxl-turbo, it disables the positive prompt, leaving only the negative one. Instead, I have to write the prompt while in sdxl-base mode, then switch to turbo.
The sdxl-turbo model works mostly fine for me, but trying to run sdxl-base results in
SystemExit: SharkifyStableDiffusionModel.get_unet_sdxl.<locals>.UnetModel.forward() missing 2 required positional arguments: 'time_ids' and 'guidance_scale'
OS: EndeavourOS/Arch Linux
GPU: RX 7900 XT (using amdvlk as mesa/vulkan-radeon is broken)
Settings: 512x512 50 steps
When switching to sdxl-turbo, it disables the positive prompt, leaving only the negative one. Instead, I have to write the prompt while in sdxl-base mode, then switch to turbo.
There's something goofy about the inputs/guidance scale for the SDXL implementation. This is actually intended behavior as a quick'n'dirty workaround but it's not a long term solution. I'll add a task for it.
Adding a list of TODOs:
[x] MultiControlNet
[ ] SDXL
[x] fix nod logo
[x] fix UX regressions caused by gradio version update